Dan Swartzendruber wrote: > > you make some good points. on the other hand, my feeling is that > if he is going to configure this linux box as a router, it should > participate as a router. e.g. the routers on the respective network > segments should treat it as such - either with static routes to the > subnets or by running some dynamic protocol. Agreed. That's why I ended one posting (has ascii diagram) with: "BTW, you have no default route... so the LM8.0 machine will not pass traffic between NetA and NetB..." Maybe that was too subtle... :^) Pierre
- [expert] routing problem Doug Gough
- Re: [expert] routing problem Dan Swartzendruber
- Re: [expert] routing problem Nathan Callahan
- Re: [expert] routing problem Dan Swartzendruber
- Re: [expert] routing problem Pierre Fortin
- Re: [expert] routing problem Dan Swartzendruber
- Re: [expert] routing problem Pierre Fortin
- Re: [expert] routing problem Dan Swartzendruber
- Re: [expert] routing problem Pierre Fortin
- Re: [expert] routing problem Ian Cottrell
- Re: [expert] routing problem Pierre Fortin
- Re: [expert] routing problem Ian Cottrell
- Re: [expert] routing problem Pierre Fortin
- Re: [expert] routing problem Ian Cottrell
