Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
> 
> you make some good points.  on the other hand, my feeling is that
> if he is going to configure this linux box as a router, it should
> participate as a router.  e.g. the routers on the respective network
> segments should treat it as such - either with static routes to the
> subnets or by running some dynamic protocol.

Agreed.  That's why I ended one posting (has ascii diagram) with:
"BTW, you have no default route...  so the LM8.0 machine will not pass traffic
between NetA and NetB..." 

Maybe that was too subtle...  :^)

Pierre

Reply via email to