On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 17:51 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> IMO it would be better to revert this change, but it's not clear to
> me what exactly the problematic behavior was that caused the change.
Hi,
I agree with you, I'm also not aware of the reason why the change in
plugins was done, the requirement of having it installed during build
time looks odd to me too. The only similarity I might see there is the
rpath (or what's that called) approach on Linux-es, aka once you link
against a library it is always at the path it was in the runtime. Not
that I'd agree to follow this semantic for junk plugins.
Please file a bug report against evolution to (partially) revert the
two commits, and name them, plus attach your patch there as well. CC
me on the bug too, thus I'll get to it sooner. I'm currently (heavy-)
breaking other stuff in the data server, but once it's done I'd like
to follow on this issue for 3.14.0.
Thanks and bye,
Milan
_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
