On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 18:12 -0400, Internaut at Large wrote:
> Might I humbly suggest that people fork the 2.22 code, and do an
> update/development on the non sqlite code-base?  That might make some
> things easier, because then the fixes existing might be easier than
> fixing the regression problems.

You're certainly free to do so, though I suspect it would be a pretty
major time investment.  Note, however, all you really need to fork is
the Camel library in Evolution-Data-Server, as Evolution itself doesn't
directly interact with the SQLite backend.

Matthew Barnes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Reply via email to