On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 18:12 -0400, Internaut at Large wrote: > Might I humbly suggest that people fork the 2.22 code, and do an > update/development on the non sqlite code-base? That might make some > things easier, because then the fixes existing might be easier than > fixing the regression problems.
You're certainly free to do so, though I suspect it would be a pretty major time investment. Note, however, all you really need to fork is the Camel library in Evolution-Data-Server, as Evolution itself doesn't directly interact with the SQLite backend. Matthew Barnes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list