I understand & agree with your point.
-- Art Alexion MIS/Central Office Support Resources for Human Development ----- Original Message ----- From: Andrew Montalenti <a...@pixelmonkey.org> To: Art Alexion Cc: evolution-list <evolution-list@gnome.org> Sent: Wed Apr 08 23:47:26 2009 Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution release and major regressions,a longtime user's thoughts Art, one clarification: On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 17:15 -0400, Art Alexion wrote: > And that is precisely the problem. N+1 is appropriate for Debian > Experimental, but not for Debian Stable. Ubuntu doesn't have those > designations, and when a new version of the distro is released, it is > released with the implication that it is stable. The thing is, Evolution 2.26 is N for the GNOME community right now, and 2.24 was N at the time Intrepid was released (making 2.22 == N-1 at the time of Intrepid's release). Ubuntu should have cherry-picked 2.22, but since it was N for GNOME, it was N for Ubuntu :-D (Hope that isn't confusing!) Andrew _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
