On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 14:42 -0700, Robin Laing wrote: > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 09:02 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote: > >> On 2/16/07, Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> <snip> > >>> While I understand the need for an Exchange client > >>> under Linux, I can't help wondering how much this distracts developer > >>> attention from the rest of Evo. > > >> >From the perspective of hoping to drive Linux desktop adoption into > >> the corporate world, Linux must have an enterprise-ready groupware > >> client that can replace Outlook with little or no loss of > >> functionality. > > > > There are several (Zimbra and Scalix come to mind), just that they > > aren't free if you want interoperability with Exchange. > > > > These look like nice server solutions but what is needed is a client > that can work flawlessly with Exchange without imap or pop support. I > hate to say it but an Outlook clone. I personally don't like Outlook, > even a bit. > > I will look into the above products closer to see if they could do what > I need.
I misspoke. Both of these are server solutions and can handle Outlook as a client, but I don't think they'll help you with an existing Exchange installation. Sorry for the confusion. poc _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
