On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 22:58 +0300, Ilya wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:54:37 -0600 > "Peter Van Lone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 1/23/07, Peter Van Lone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > just to throw more fuel on this: > > > > I used the evo version (and exch connector) that came with SUSE 10.0 > > ... and had the following issues: > > > > 1)really really slow startup (excruciating) > > 2)"generic error" subscribing to another users calendar > > 3)fairly often crashing > > 4)general flakiness > > > > I upgraded that version to 2.6 (still on SUSE 10.0) and it seemed that > > the startup speed improved marginally, but the other errors/issues > > persisted. > > > > I now have a fresh, clean install of SLED running 2.6 EVO ... same > > damn issues. Plus, there does not seem to be a way to upgrade to any > > newer version on SLED 10. But, from what I am hearing, the 2.8.x > > versions and above are no better. > > > > Can you say "not ready for a corporate deployment"? Can you say ... if > > the brutus option is not better, then EVO is just not an option. I > > guess I'll have to keep using *something*, perhaps I'll continue to > > struggle with EVO, but I will NOT suggest it to customers. > > > > Despite that gentoo evo 2.8 branch is masked, it's noticeably better > than 2.6 > > Ilya.
2.8 is much faster and well...bit more stable. (ps.I have to use Evol because of the MS freaks we have in the IT department, but I believe that email should be web-based, with local offline cache; fat clients are just an overkill) E-Mail disclaimer: http://www.sunspace.co.za/emaildisclaimer.htm _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
