On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 7:48 PM Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I've given a retreocausal mechanism of course: > > https://codicalist.wordpress.com/2018/03/16/mirror-mirror/ > As I said, even more mystical than 'spooky-action-at-a-distance'. Bruce If you know of other references, let me know. > > @philipthrift > > > On Tuesday, June 4, 2019 at 10:22:51 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 1:15 PM Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> As for quantum stochastic retrodependency (which physicists avoid like >>> vampires avoid sunlight), it simplifies the "puzzles" of QM, meaning that, >>> for the most part, the articles you see talking about the "spooky action at >>> a distance" or "many wolds" of QM you can dump in the trashcan and save a >>> lot of time! >>> >> >> The trouble is that these retrocausal "explanations" do not actually >> explain anything! They sound like they should: "The formation of the EPR >> pair depends on the future setting of the polarises as well as on the state >> preparation." (Or something similar). But no detailed dynamics are ever >> given, and the supposed explanation is even more mystical than "spooky >> action at a distance...." >> >> Bruce >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLScNMkfxF8gbCYXPEfdZz9UmNb6TgB%3Dga382Ez-XwJ0xQ%40mail.gmail.com.
