I've given a retreocausal mechanism of course: https://codicalist.wordpress.com/2018/03/16/mirror-mirror/
If you know of other references, let me know. @philipthrift On Tuesday, June 4, 2019 at 10:22:51 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 1:15 PM Philip Thrift <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> As for quantum stochastic retrodependency (which physicists avoid like >> vampires avoid sunlight), it simplifies the "puzzles" of QM, meaning that, >> for the most part, the articles you see talking about the "spooky action at >> a distance" or "many wolds" of QM you can dump in the trashcan and save a >> lot of time! >> > > The trouble is that these retrocausal "explanations" do not actually > explain anything! They sound like they should: "The formation of the EPR > pair depends on the future setting of the polarises as well as on the state > preparation." (Or something similar). But no detailed dynamics are ever > given, and the supposed explanation is even more mystical than "spooky > action at a distance...." > > Bruce > > >> If quantum computers become a reality, you might be able to see it at >> work in a computer you could program. >> >> @philiphrift >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/9ecec36a-2ca5-47c4-b639-6d385cbd671e%40googlegroups.com.
