On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 1:15 PM Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote:
> > As for quantum stochastic retrodependency (which physicists avoid like > vampires avoid sunlight), it simplifies the "puzzles" of QM, meaning that, > for the most part, the articles you see talking about the "spooky action at > a distance" or "many wolds" of QM you can dump in the trashcan and save a > lot of time! > The trouble is that these retrocausal "explanations" do not actually explain anything! They sound like they should: "The formation of the EPR pair depends on the future setting of the polarises as well as on the state preparation." (Or something similar). But no detailed dynamics are ever given, and the supposed explanation is even more mystical than "spooky action at a distance...." Bruce > If quantum computers become a reality, you might be able to see it at work > in a computer you could program. > > @philiphrift > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLRZn9%3DbsvvDPATM%3DCC3EJQncFTj42ezbn3RsswycyaiKw%40mail.gmail.com.
