On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 05:36:42PM -0800, Edgar L. Owen wrote: > Russell, > > Sorry, but you miss my argument. The 1:1 correspondence is between actual > or present moment time, not clock time. Please refer to my proximate > responses to Jesse for the details of the argument. > > Edgar > >
The only way for your argument to make sense is for the correspondence to be between proper times along each worldline. You are in the process of trying to define your "present moment". You cannot use what you are trying to construct as a building block for that construction. But that correspondence is not unique, as I mentioned. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics [email protected] University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
