You're so a joke... cannot doubt your own genius eh !

2014-02-01 Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]>:

> Jesse,
>
> Yes, that "being at the same point in spacetime" is CALLED the present
> moment that I'm talking about.
>
> You are probably repeating the claim that 'coordinate time' falsifies
> p-time. It doesn't. Coordinate time is an attempt to explain the obvious
> problems with clock time not actually explaining a common present moment
> that obviously exists. This is done by coordinate time saying OK we have to
> account for the twins being at the same point in spacetime when they
> compare clocks so let's just invent a coordinate system that acts as if
> clock time doesn't have any effect on something we will call coordinate
> time.
>
> Basically coordinate time is just an attempt to account for the
> obviousness of a present moment without actually calling it a 2nd kind of
> time but rather just a 2nd kind of spacetime coordinate system in a single
> kind of time.
>
> Coordinate time is half way to p-time but hasn't incorporated the whole
> insight... It basically says let's pretend clock time doesn't really happen
> so the twins can end up at the SAME point of spacetime because it's obvious
> they actually did. But then it remembers that clock time is real and actual
> too because it is measurable. Therefore there is a CONTRADICTION between
> coordinate time and clock time that p-time resolves by recognizing that
> p-time and clock time are actually 2 separate kinds of time, which
> coordinate time doesn't.
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
> On Saturday, February 1, 2014 11:30:26 AM UTC-5, jessem wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And of course it is OBVIOUS that the twins share a common present moment
>>> when they compare clocks. Otherwise they couldn't compare clocks now could
>>> they?
>>>
>>
>> The fact that they can compare clocks, and agree for example that "twin
>> A's turning 30 coincides with twin B's turning 40", is because they are
>> making the comparison at the same point in spacetime (assuming ideal
>> point-like observers*), and in relativity, all observers agree on which
>> events coincide at the same point in spacetime (I've asked you several
>> times whether you agree this is always true in relativity but you have
>> refused so far to answer). Another way of putting it is that in any
>> spacetime coordinate system for labeling the space and time coordinates of
>> different events, the event "twin A turns 30" would have to be labeled with
>> the same coordinate time (and coordinate position) as the event "twin B
>> turns 40". In no way does any of this imply the notion of an objective
>> "common present" for events which do NOT coincide at the same point in
>> spacetime.
>>
>> *Of course real observers aren't point-like, but if you think of extended
>> observers who compare clocks a few feet apart, there could be disagreements
>> over which event happened first in precise terms (whether we're talking
>> about visual observations of the events, or which event happened first in
>> some inertial frame), but we can say that everyone would agree the two
>> events happened within a few tiny fractions of a nanosecond from each
>> other, so for all practical purposes there is no disagreement about the
>> fact that twin A turning 30 coincided with twin B turning 40.
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>



-- 
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
Batty/Rutger Hauer)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to