On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Brent,
>
> Obviously the space outside a black hole event horizon is warped. That's
> experimentally confirmed. My question is HOW does it become warped from the
> mass inside the black hole which you now claim doesn't even exist? There
> must be some cause. It's much more reasonable to assume the mass that
> enters a black hole does exist inside the black hole as it does produce a
> gravitational effect. My question is how that gravitational effect, which
> must travel at the speed of light, propagate from the interior of the black
> hole when nothing else can because it would have to travel at FASTER than
> the speed of light to do so?
>

Gravitation like electrostatics is faster than the speed of light-
seemingly instantaneous

>
> Re your implication of gravitation perhaps not being mediated by force
> carrying particles. I think there are a number of reasons to doubt the
> existence of gravitons.
>
> 1. For a flow of gravitons to explain gravity they would all continuously
> have to flow in the same direction since gravity acts only in one direction
> (between masses at least). That means there would have to be an
> inexhaustible source of gravitons flowing from ONLY OUT from every mass.
> What's the source of that inexhaustible flow?
>
> 2. Gravity is the only force that cannot be shielded. Thus if gravitons
> existed they would have to flow effortlessly THROUGH everything that exists
> (NON-interaction) at the same time they cause gravitational effects
> (INTERACTION). An apparent contradiction....
>
> 3. There is no empirical evidence whatsoever that gravitons actually exist.
>
> 4. Gravitons are not part of the Standard Model.
>
> So all and all I think there is plenty of reason to doubt the existence of
> gravitons...
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 24, 2014 10:31:41 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>>
>> On 1/24/2014 4:41 PM, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>> > Brent,
>> >
>> > No, my proposed dark matter effect has nothing to do with black holes.
>> Black holes are
>> > caused by accumulations of actual visible matter, not by the Hubble
>> expansion of space...
>> >
>> > However I do have a question for you. Since gravitational changes
>> propagate at the speed
>> > of light how does the mass inside a black hole produce gravitational
>> effects outside the
>> > black hole? If light can't come out how can gravitational effects come
>> out?
>>
>> You are thinking of gravity as mediated by force particles, like photons
>> mediate the EM
>> forces.  But (at least classically) gravity isn't a force, it's just a
>> shape of space and
>> as I responded to Liz, there's not mass in a black hole, no T_u_v term in
>> the Einstein
>> equation.  It's a vacuum solution.  That's why it doesn't make any
>> different what falls in
>> to create the black hole.  The effects outside the event horizon are just
>> that the space
>> is warped there just *as if* the black hole were a massive object.
>>
>> Brent
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to