On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]> wrote:
> PGC, > > No, you have your facts wrong. I did NOT start this. My post you quoted > was in response to Freq's previous comment that "Also, I am really > starting to understand why you have difficulty with finding a life > partner." > > Just check your own post. You will see that comment by Freq down below My > post. > > If you can't even get your facts straight you can't be taken seriously.... > > Edgar > > Just exchange "start" for "fuel" and my interpretation, including that the thread is increasingly derailed by your private details + implications as subject, stays the same. I "don't get my facts straight" because I don't really care about the details of this nonsense. Inappropriate from both sides and doesn't belong into the thread, as I don't understand what this is contributing to consciousness/states of matter etc. If you can make that clear, please share. PGC > > > On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 9:45:03 AM UTC-5, Platonist Guitar Cowboy > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Telmo Menezes <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:26 AM, freqflyer07281972 >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > "SEEKING A COMPATIBLE WOMAN OR LONG TERM COMPANION: I'm seeking a >>> > compatible, loyal, caring, natural, affectionate, non-feminist woman >>> who >>> > believes that male female relationships should not be adversarial or >>> > selfish, but based on mutual love, trust and benefit. Hopefully young >>> and >>> > healthy enough to be able to help me out through my old age. I'm also >>> open >>> > to the possibility of a long term possibly live in friend or companion >>> to >>> > share my house and help take care of things. Someone quiet, peaceful >>> and >>> > down to earth who appreciates my work and lifestyle would be ideal. >>> That >>> > could be either a man or woman or even a couple. If you are interested >>> in >>> > discussing this further or know someone who might be please feel free >>> to >>> > contact me at [email protected]. " >>> >>> > >>> > And you said i didn't read things... >>> >>> This is none of our business nor is it relevant in any way. >>> Being a big defender of the right to anonymity, it makes me sad that >>> you use yours against Edgar in such a low fashion. >>> >>> "Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds >>> discuss people." >>> -- Eleanor Roosevelt >>> >>> >> Sure, but Edgar did start this nonsense challenging provocatively "I have >> a life partner. A truly wonderful one. You?"; with all those implications. >> That's where "this is none of our business" started and derailed the thread >> in that fashion. >> >> Isn't this rather: As you sow, so you shall reap? Can a flasher complain *to >> the person they just...inappropriately exposed themselves to*, that his >> privacy was violated unfairly? Good question these days, what with privacy, >> consent, digital spying, cryptography etc... >> >> Don't get me wrong though. I guess snooping is low like flashing, consent >> of some party is violated in both cases. If you denounce one, you have to >> denounce the other though; that is, if you want to keep your denouncer >> street cred, uhm credible, solid, consistent, peer reviewed and mirror >> truth in the absolute because it's simply, really true, ok?. Good. ;-) PGC >> >> >>> > >>> > On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:21:39 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Freq, >>> >> >>> >> But I have a life partner, a truly wonderful one. >>> >> >>> >> You? >>> >> >>> >> Edgar >>> >> >>> >> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:03:55 PM UTC-5, freqflyer07281972 >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Also, I am really starting to understand why you have difficulty with >>> >>> finding a life partner. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:02:30 PM UTC-5, freqflyer07281972 >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> OK. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adfm.201200640/abstract >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:56:09 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Freq, >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Yes it is too easy. Do you actually read anything before you >>> respond? >>> >>>>> Note I said "that could replace biological neurons one by one". >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Send me a few links referencing that being possible please.... >>> >>>>> :-) >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Edgar >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:51:13 PM UTC-5, freqflyer07281972 >>> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:24:31 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen >>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Jason, >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> There are no 'synthetic neurons' that could replace biological >>> ones >>> >>>>>>> "one by one". When there are let me know and I'll check them >>> out and answer >>> >>>>>>> your question. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> You are letting your imagination run wild here imagining things >>> with >>> >>>>>>> no basis in reality as if they were true. When we study reality >>> we study >>> >>>>>>> what is actually true, not sci fi no matter how 'cool' it's >>> thought to >>> >>>>>>> be.... >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Edgar >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> http://metabiological.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/ >>> first-synthetic-neuron-created/ >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> http://www.princeton.edu/pccmeducation/undergrad/reu/ >>> researchprojects/REU2008Presentations/duseja-richardson.pdf >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> http://www.neurotechreports.com/pages/hybrids.html >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> http://www.dvice.com/2012-12-2/worlds-most-complex- >>> artificial-brain-ever-passes-iq-tests >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> This is too easy... >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Does Edgar have a higher difficulty setting? >>> > >>> > -- >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups >>> > "Everything List" group. >>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an >>> > email to [email protected]. >>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> >>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Everything List" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
