On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Telmo Menezes <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:26 AM, freqflyer07281972 > <[email protected]> wrote: > > "SEEKING A COMPATIBLE WOMAN OR LONG TERM COMPANION: I'm seeking a > > compatible, loyal, caring, natural, affectionate, non-feminist woman who > > believes that male female relationships should not be adversarial or > > selfish, but based on mutual love, trust and benefit. Hopefully young and > > healthy enough to be able to help me out through my old age. I'm also > open > > to the possibility of a long term possibly live in friend or companion to > > share my house and help take care of things. Someone quiet, peaceful and > > down to earth who appreciates my work and lifestyle would be ideal. That > > could be either a man or woman or even a couple. If you are interested in > > discussing this further or know someone who might be please feel free to > > contact me at [email protected]. " > > > > And you said i didn't read things... > > This is none of our business nor is it relevant in any way. > Being a big defender of the right to anonymity, it makes me sad that > you use yours against Edgar in such a low fashion. > > "Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds > discuss people." > -- Eleanor Roosevelt > > Sure, but Edgar did start this nonsense challenging provocatively "I have a life partner. A truly wonderful one. You?"; with all those implications. That's where "this is none of our business" started and derailed the thread in that fashion. Isn't this rather: As you sow, so you shall reap? Can a flasher complain *to the person they just...inappropriately exposed themselves to*, that his privacy was violated unfairly? Good question these days, what with privacy, consent, digital spying, cryptography etc... Don't get me wrong though. I guess snooping is low like flashing, consent of some party is violated in both cases. If you denounce one, you have to denounce the other though; that is, if you want to keep your denouncer street cred, uhm credible, solid, consistent, peer reviewed and mirror truth in the absolute because it's simply, really true, ok?. Good. ;-) PGC > > > > On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:21:39 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote: > >> > >> Freq, > >> > >> But I have a life partner, a truly wonderful one. > >> > >> You? > >> > >> Edgar > >> > >> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:03:55 PM UTC-5, freqflyer07281972 wrote: > >>> > >>> Also, I am really starting to understand why you have difficulty with > >>> finding a life partner. > >>> > >>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:02:30 PM UTC-5, freqflyer07281972 wrote: > >>>> > >>>> OK. > >>>> > >>>> http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adfm.201200640/abstract > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:56:09 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Freq, > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes it is too easy. Do you actually read anything before you respond? > >>>>> Note I said "that could replace biological neurons one by one". > >>>>> > >>>>> Send me a few links referencing that being possible please.... > >>>>> :-) > >>>>> > >>>>> Edgar > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:51:13 PM UTC-5, freqflyer07281972 > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:24:31 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jason, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> There are no 'synthetic neurons' that could replace biological ones > >>>>>>> "one by one". When there are let me know and I'll check them out > and answer > >>>>>>> your question. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You are letting your imagination run wild here imagining things > with > >>>>>>> no basis in reality as if they were true. When we study reality we > study > >>>>>>> what is actually true, not sci fi no matter how 'cool' it's > thought to > >>>>>>> be.... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Edgar > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > http://metabiological.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/first-synthetic-neuron-created/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > http://www.princeton.edu/pccmeducation/undergrad/reu/researchprojects/REU2008Presentations/duseja-richardson.pdf > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://www.neurotechreports.com/pages/hybrids.html > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > http://www.dvice.com/2012-12-2/worlds-most-complex-artificial-brain-ever-passes-iq-tests > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This is too easy... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Does Edgar have a higher difficulty setting? > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Everything List" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to [email protected]. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
