On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 07:58:35AM -0400, Roger Clough wrote: > Hi Russell Standish > > 1) It is a cruelty of nature to make the two IMHO most powerful thinkers > (Peirce and Leibniz) to be the two most difficult to understand. > I would not throw them out just yet.
I'm not. But until someone can demonstrate the utility of their thought to a field of interest to me, I'm unlikely to want to invest in them. > > 2) If somebody can make something useful out of autopoesis, > more power to them. At first, it looked like the solution > to everything, but then I just couldn't find anything to grasp. > With the exception of Peirce, I found semiotics to be similar. > I think we're in agreement here (except on Peirce, perhaps). -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics [email protected] University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
