This is my schema.
Can you complete/ammend it?
Things in themselves (noumena) -> - Have a computational nature (Bruno) :
few components: numbers, + *
- Is just a
mathematical manyfold(Me), few components: equations
- Are Monadic
(Roger). many components
- Are phisical:
includes the "phisical world" with: space, time persons, cars.
(physicalists)
Things perceived (phenomena) -> - Relies on the architecture of the mind,
the activity of the brain (a local arangement that
keep entropy
constant along a direction in space-time, the product of natural selection
Therefore,
existence is selected (Me)
- The mind is a
robust computation -and therefore implies a certain selection- (Bruno)
- Are created by the
activity of the supreme monad (Roger)
- Does not matter
(physicalists)
2012/9/23 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]>
>
> On 22 Sep 2012, at 20:05, Stephen P. King wrote:
>
>
> With comp, all the exists comes from the "ExP(x)" use in arithmetic, and
> their arithmetical epistemological version, like []Ex[]P(x), or
> []<>Ex[]<>P(x), etc.
>
>
> Can not you see, Bruno, that this stipulation makes existence
> contingent upon the ability to be defined by a symbol and thus on human
> whim? It is the tool-maker and user that is talking through you here.
>
>
> Confusion of level. The stipulation used to described such existence does
> not makes such existence contingent at all. Only the stipulation is
> contingent, not its content, which can be considered as absolute, as we
> work in the standard model (by the very definition of comp: we work with
> standard comp (we would not say "yes" to a doctor if he propose a non
> standard cording of our brain).
>
>
>
>
>
>
> That gives a testable toy theology (testable as such a theology contains
> the physics as a subpart).
>
>
> Testable, sure, but theology should never be contingent. It must flow
> from pure necessity and our finite models are simply insufficient for this
> task.
>
>
> First our model is not finite, only our theories and machines are. And the
> AUDA illustrates clearly that theology's shape (the hypostases) follows
> pure necessity, even if all machine will define a particular arithmetical
> content for each theology, but this is natural, as it concerns the private
> life of individual machine (it is the same for us by default in all
> religion).
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>
--
Alberto.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
