On Wednesday, September 3, 2025 at 8:05:59 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:

On Wednesday, September 3, 2025 at 6:05:55 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:

On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 6:05 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:

On Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 2:16:15 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:

 

>>Thanks for the exposition.
Brent


*>But you, being the expert you are, already "knew" the answer. It had to 
do with the wf of a photon. But oddly, you haven't a clue what differential 
equation would have to be solved to obtain that wf. WTF. AG*


*As seen below, the electromagnetic wave function is described by 4 
differential equations discovered by James Maxwell about 10 years before 
Einstein was born :*




*Gauss's Law for Electricity: ∇ ⋅ E = ρ / ε₀ Gauss's Law for Magnetism: ∇ ⋅ 
B = 0 Faraday's Law of Induction: ∇ × E = -∂B/∂t Ampère's Law  ∇ × B = μ₀J 
+ μ₀ε₀∂E/∂t *

*To this day those equations are the bread and butter of electrical 
engineers, they don't include any of the quantum properties of light but 
they don't need to in order to explain the Doppler red shift. If you want 
to find the quantum wave function, and not just the electromagnetic wave 
function, and also include relativistic effects, then things become a 
little more complicated. *

*In the two-slit experiment, if you quantize the electromagnetic field, the 
field amplitude takes on the role of a photon’s probability amplitude. That 
amplitude behaves like a wave, so it interferes, and the squared magnitude 
(|E|^2) gives the probability distribution for where a photon is likely to 
be detected on the screen.*

*How can the amplitude give a probability if its value is generally not 
less than unity? AG *


*Another problem with this is that the amplitude is defined for multiple 
photons, not for a single photon, whose wf I am seeking to acquire and 
understand. AG *

*If you send photons one at a time, each detection looks random, but over 
many trials the hits build up exactly into the interference pattern 
predicted by |E|^2.*

*When you use a bright source, such as a laser, you no longer just have a 
single photon but a huge number of them, so |E|^2 doesn’t just describe a 
probability distribution, it gives the average number of photons arriving 
at each point. And as the number of photons increases classical optics 
approximates quantum mechanics more and more closely. *

*John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis 
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*

*tvi*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/df84cedd-0740-4737-b077-7dc1b703a172n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to