On Sunday, August 17, 2025 at 2:00:28 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:



On 8/16/2025 4:37 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:



On Saturday, August 16, 2025 at 12:56:53 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:



On 8/16/2025 12:27 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:



On Monday, August 11, 2025 at 10:21:16 PM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:

On Sunday, August 10, 2025 at 8:23:53 PM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:

On Sunday, August 10, 2025 at 5:51:31 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:

On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 6:01 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:

On Saturday, August 9, 2025 at 5:45:01 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:

*Until very recently the most distant object our telescopes can see had a 
redshift of about 14, but very recently there are reports that the James 
Webb telescope has seen point-like objects that seem to have a redshift of 
25! Whatever these objects are they contain little or no dust as you'd 
expect because dust requires elements other than hydrogen and helium which 
need to be made in stars, but if we really are looking at an object that 
has a red shift of 25 then we're looking at something that existed before 
stars did. If confirmed that would be a pretty profound discovery, and 
about the only thing that could explain them are Primordial Black Holes 
created during the first nanosecond after the Big Bang.*
  

*JWST Found Objects at Insane New Distances (Redshift of 25?!)* 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saL_1R1WitA&t=797s>


*> How is the red shift related to the velocity of light? How large must it 
be to equal c? TY, AG *


*Because space is expanding and accelerating, galaxies that have a redshift 
greater than about 1.7 are today moving away from us faster than the speed 
of light, so we can never reach them or even send a message to them, they 
are beyond our causal horizon; however today we can still see them because 
at the time the light from them was emitted the galaxy was closer to us 
than it is now, and back then it was receding away from us slower than it 
is now, slower than the speed of light. For the same reason today we can 
even detect the Cosmic Microwave Background even though it has a redshift 
of about 1100, but we could never send a message or influence anything that 
happens that far away.*

*John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis 
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*


TY. If it's not too much trouble, can you show me how you do that 
calculation? AG 


What is the physical interpretation of the huge red shift of the CMB? It 
can't mean extreme recessional velocity since it's here, everywhere, in 
every direction. AG 


Since the CMB isn't receding, what is the physical interpretation of its 
huge red shift? AG 

It's all relative.  We're receding, if you insist on "somebody is 
receding".  The bit of the CMB we see is a further away bit every day.  Its 
photons have traveled to us thru space that has been expanding as they 
traveled.

Brent


Since I am free to choose any observer is receding, I did. But more 
important is your model of the photon. Since the wave property of light is 
an ensemble property, what allows you to claim they lose energy as the 
universe expands? AG 

Suppose you and a pro-baseball pitcher are standing alongside a road 
playing catch.  When you catch his fastball it has an energy of 70J and 
stings thru you glove.  Now his throw is little off and instead going to 
you, it is caught by a kid in a passing car going the same direction as the 
throw.  But when the kid catches it bare handed it doesn't even hurt 
because it's only got an energy of 2J.  How did the ball loose energy?

Brent


Good question. The ball caught by the observer in the moving car didn't 
lose all of its kinetic energy, and kept moving with the car after being 
caught, whereas all the kinetic energy of the ball was disappated into 
recoil, sound waves, and heating of the material in the glove, when the 
ball was fully stopped by the guy on the ground catching the ball.  Now 
that I've answered your question, tell me how a point particle, the photon, 
can get it wave stretched by an expanding universe. AG

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f8ac46a1-bcc7-4577-984b-f57e13127880n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to