On Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at 1:52 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:

*>> The conservation of energy is not a statement about pure mathematics or
>> logic, it is a statement about the physical world, so it's not surprising
>> that historically its derivation has come from observation and
>> experimentation. Nobody has ever been able to derive the conservation of
>> energy from logic alone, and I very much doubt anybody ever will. In fact
>> nobody has ever been able to derive ANY physical law from mathematics
>> alone, unless you want to say that it's a physical law that 2 rocks plus
>> another 2 rocks is equal to 4 rocks.  *
>
>
>
> *> You're mistaken. Try this, by
> Feynman, 
> https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/8-01sc-classical-mechanics-fall-2016/mit8_01scs22_chapter14.pdf
> <https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/8-01sc-classical-mechanics-fall-2016/mit8_01scs22_chapter14.pdf>If
> you look, you'll see that Feynman shows that in classical mechanics, energy
> is conserved on a closed loop. He proves many other things about energy
> conservation in that link.*



*NO!  Feynman proved IF you assume that a system obeys the Principle Of
Least Action AND you assume that the system has Time-translation invariance
THEN, because of Noether's theorem, the system must obey the law of
Conservation Of Energy. But both the Principle Of Least Action and
Time-Translation Invariance are observations, NOT logical necessities. I
can imagine a universe with different physics in which neither the
Principle Of Least Action nor Time Translation Invariance are true, but I
can't imagine a universe that contained a largest prime number. *

*John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*

753

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv1Pc%3Dk6n%3D8Hkth86rv17U%2Bwy%3Dxh3Te8feJg-6%3Di5F9snQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to