On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 9:51 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
*>>> In CM it can be shown that the sum of kinetic and potential energy is > unchanged. The proof isn't difficult. AG**In* CM it can be shown that the > sum of kinetic and potential energy is unchanged. The proof isn't diffiultAG > > > *>> BULLSHIT! The conservation of energy is not a statement about pure > mathematics or logic, it is a statement about the physical world, so it's > not surprising that historically its derivation has come from observation > and experimentation. Nobody has ever been able to derive the conservation > of energy from logic alone, and I very much doubt anybody ever will. In > fact nobody has ever been able to derive ANY physical law from mathematics > alone, unless you want to say that it's a physical law that 2 rocks plus > another 2 rocks is equal to 4 rocks. * > > > *>You're mistaken.* > *BULLSHIT!* * > Look it up. AG* *I can't, it doesn't exist. * * John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>* ude \ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2x4qU00O74LtuPUeM2gWb1CzK028fG2SFCP6QZLuV1kQ%40mail.gmail.com.
