On 6/3/2025 9:04 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 9:57:05 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:



    On 6/3/2025 5:52 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


    On Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 6:29:49 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:



        On 6/3/2025 2:05 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:


        On Monday, June 2, 2025 at 9:50:54 PM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:

            On Monday, June 2, 2025 at 9:14:49 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker
            wrote:



                On 6/2/2025 6:48 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


                On Monday, June 2, 2025 at 7:14:47 PM UTC-6 Brent
                Meeker wrote:

                    And you are too susceptible to casually
                    assuming you understand the familiar just
                    because it's familiar.  Your alarm clock
                    measures time by the oscillations of a wheel,
                    which depend on the inertia of the wheel.  Do
                    you understand "the reality of that inertia"?

                    Brent


                You'd be in a much better position to defend Clark
                if either of you could define the clock inherent in
                a muon, but you don't seem able to meet that
                challenge. AG
                I think John can take care of himself.

                If muon's don't have an inherent clock, how do they
                know when to decay?

                Brent


            You're assuming they have a clock, but avoid describing
            its form, or how it reads the time, if it reads the
            time. So many things assumed but no answers in sight. AG


        I suppose you were referring to the atmosphere producing an
        anti-inertial effect on the muons, but what's lacking is an
        explanation, or if you like MODEL, of how that effects the
        half-life of those particles.
        Do you have a model of how relativistic motion makes a wrist
        watch run slower?

        Brent


    In the frame wherein you allege the wrist watch is running
    slower, it isn't. In some other frame, moving at constant
    velocity wrt that wrist watch, it appears to be running slower.
    Which watch should we pay attention to? AG
    The one in the frame where the muons run slower.

    Brent


That would have been my guess, but it makes no sense. How would a muon have contact with another frame as the observer, in which its clocks seem to tick at a lower rate? AG
You seem to have lost the point.  We're not discussing why time dilation occurs.  It's obviously not a matter of "contact" between frames; but it's also beside the point.  The point is that whatever is responsible for muons having a particular half-life when stationary, changes with speed exactly the same way clocks change with speed.  It's a point of evidence for muons having the same physical relation to time as clocks.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a7196089-dd8b-4ea8-b459-aa44e11455ee%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to