Jim, interesting short-sightedness. Rate payers today enjoy the investments done with money from rate payers of previous years, no? Cor.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 5:05 PM jim--- via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote: > > David said: > > Good luck with that. Most of our "investor owned" utilities don't have a > > good track record of even keeping up with current maintenance, much less > > actually planning for the future. > > For the most part, at least here in California, the investor owned utilities > largely are not allowed to plan (or more accurately to spend) for the future. > In really short summary, the concept is that rate payers today should not > have to pay for future projects. That is an insanely simple explanation of a > very complex process, but it's a fairly accurate summary. > > As I understand it, most other states are at least similar. > > > 73 > ----- > Jim Walls - K6CCC > j...@k6ccc.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org > No other addresses in TO and CC fields > HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/ > _______________________________________________ Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org No other addresses in TO and CC fields HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
