With Ford’s reveal, is he contemplating the F-150 Lightning in its place?

I think it very exciting to potentially even have choice in the near future. It 
certainly raises the bar for everyone.

- Mark

Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone

> On May 20, 2021, at 10:50 AM, Rod Hower <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> My son put $100 down for the Tesla Cybertruck.  He will sell his 13 MPG 
> lifted Jeep Gladiator once he gets the Cybertruck.
> 
> On Thursday, May 20, 2021, 01:38:32 PM EDT, Mark Abramowitz via EV 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> But back to the Ford F-150 Lightning - $40-90k before incentives. Doesn’t 
> sound cheap, but it performs better than any F-150 has ever performed, which 
> is exactly what’s needed to generate sales and excitement, and make it *the* 
> F-150 to own. Hopefully the base 230 mile range will be sufficient for most.
> 
> $100 to reserve one - any takers on this list?
> 
> - Mark
> 
> Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone
> 
> > On May 20, 2021, at 7:11 AM, Mark Abramowitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > Didn’t exactly sneak it in...just put it where it made sense.
> > 
> > I agree about a range extended, but for those who want the option to pull 
> > lots of power out at a construction site, or *maybe* even a landscaper that 
> > need to charge their batteries for their equipment, a fuel cell for 
> > auxiliary power may make more sense.
> > 
> > - Mark
> > 
> > Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone
> > 
> >> On May 20, 2021, at 7:03 AM, Peri Hartman via EV <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Haha, I new you'd sneak in fuel cells. :) I'll give you this. I think it 
> >> makes more sense to do range extension with a fuel cell than with an ICE.
> >> 
> >> Does anyone have an idea which would be more compact for a given amount of 
> >> net energy: fuel cell + tank or battery ?
> >> 
> >> Peri
> >> 
> >> << Annoyed by leaf blowers ? https://quietcleanseattle.org/ >>
> >> 
> >> ------ Original Message ------
> >> From: "Mark Abramowitz" <[email protected]>
> >> To: "Peri Hartman" <[email protected]>; "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" 
> >> <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: 19-May-21 10:39:27 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [EVDL] Ford F-150 Reveal
> >> 
> >>> I really don’t care - if it gets people interested in EVs as a cool, high 
> >>> performance vehicle, that’s great.
> >>> 
> >>> This is a middle America meat and potatoes vehicle.
> >>> 
> >>> Over time it will get lighter, and what you saw was one with added weight 
> >>> from a larger battery pack and other extras.
> >>> 
> >>> I wouldn’t be surprised that option disappeared over time, and if you 
> >>> need all that extra juice, you’ll be able to get a fuel cell electric 
> >>> version. (Sorry, that’s just the more fitting EV option for that need)
> >>> 
> >>> I see this vehicle as game-changing as the Tesla.
> >>> 
> >>> Then there are the other two that they drove up on stage - both look 
> >>> great, but actually the light commercial vehicle is of greater import and 
> >>> impact.
> >>> 
> >>> - Mark
> >>> 
> >>> Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone
> >>> 
> >>>>>> On May 19, 2021, at 8:59 PM, Peri Hartman via EV <[email protected]> 
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> I think it will be popular. So much for making efficient vehicles - 
> >>>>> one estimate I read put the small pack at 115kWh. But most buyers won't 
> >>>>> care. They want the F-150 look, the power, and the range. It must weigh 
> >>>>> a ton. No, make that 3 tons.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Peri
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> << Annoyed by leaf blowers ? https://quietcleanseattle.org/ >>
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> ------ Original Message ------
> >>>>> From: "Lawrence Rhodes via EV" <[email protected]>
> >>>>> To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <[email protected]>
> >>>>> Cc: "Lawrence Rhodes" <[email protected]>
> >>>>> Sent: 19-May-21 7:18:43 PM
> >>>>> Subject: [EVDL] Ford F-150 Reveal
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yjisj5T0VqE Bigger frunk than Tesla. 
> >>>>>> Same price for the low end model. Lots of intelligent features. This 
> >>>>>> is a real competitor to the Cybertruck. Lawrence Rhodes
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Address messages to [email protected]
> >>>>>> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> >>>>>> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
> >>>>>> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Address messages to [email protected]
> >>>>> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> >>>>> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
> >>>>> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> >>>>> 
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Address messages to [email protected]
> >> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> >> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
> >> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Address messages to [email protected]
> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20210520/0d4ee734/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Address messages to [email protected]
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org

Reply via email to