On 6/25/2014 2:04 PM, Dennis Miles wrote:
Sorry, that is "Hazardous Material Handling" protocol.

*Dennis Lee Miles *





On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Dennis Miles <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    The difficulty in using Ammonia is, the ammonia used is "Anhydrous
    Ammonia 100% and that is deadly poison at only a few percent  when
    breathed. Household ammonia is less than 5% concentration in water
    and not useable in the process. Forget It !! I don't want to
    certainly die by poisoning in a minor collision.
    "
    Ha
    z
    m
    at"
    protocol calls for an evacuation of 3 mile radius in the event of
    an Anhydrous ammonia spill...

    *Dennis Lee Miles *

    /Director /*E.V.T.I. Inc.***

    /E-Mail:/*[email protected]*
    <mailto:[email protected]>

    /Phone #/ *(863) 944-9913 <tel:%28863%29%20944-9913>*

    Dade City, Florida 33523

     USA




    On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Geoff Pullinger via EV
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        On 6/25/2014 9:36 AM, Robert Bruninga via EV wrote:

            Generally, Hydrogen for transportation (no infrastructure)
            makes little
            sense compared to EV's (everyone has an outlet in their
            garage).  The
            business model for hydrogen cars is very weak (though it
            is needed for
            trucks and road warriors).



            BUT!



            There is a future for hydrogen in utility scale
            applications for the
            eventual Bazgigawatts of periodic solar and wind excess
            into electrolysis
            of water to hydrogen.  Think of it as energy storage (the
            holy grail of
            renewables).



            But then creating a HUGE infrastructure from zero to
            distribute this
            hydrogen source  in tiny little buckets to burn everywhere
            in tiny amounts
            in millions of cars makes no sense, when the utilities can
            far, far more
            easily burn it right there at their plants to provide a
            continuum of
            electricity at night and/or low wind.



            Another way to look at it is to have the utilities burn
            the excess hydrogen
            to make electricity and use the grid to distribute that
            electricity to
            EV's.  That is a far easier way to distribute "hydrogen
            stored energy"
            since EV's and the grid distribution already exist everywhere.



            Of course, there will always be a market for SOME hydrogen
            fueled cars and
            trucks that must do long trips or continuous road travel.
             No question.
            But that is something like only 10% or our transportation
            energy... and easy
            to implement along the interstates...



            P.S.  There is another thing I just became aware of.
             Other countries
            versus the US with respect to Energy Storage..  Not
            everything is equal.
            Germany has a different perspective on storage (hydrogen)
            for many
            reasons...   they have no natural gas like we do.  They
            cannot use natural
            gas plants to make-up solar/wind shortages.  Where we view
            "storage" as a
            short-term (max 12 hour overnight) need, they view storage
            as a long-term
            requirement and not just for backup electricity, but for
            weeks or months...



            
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2014/06/energy-storage-a-different-view-from-germany?cmpid=SolarNL-Tuesday-June24-2014



            Just some thoughts.

            Bob, WB4aPR
            -------------- next part --------------
            An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
            URL:
            
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20140625/c518d803/attachment.htm>
            _______________________________________________
            UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
            http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
            For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA
            (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

        I saw an article last week about a couple of scientists who
        thought hydrogen could be transported much more easily as
        ammonia (NH3). They have suposedly discovered a method to
        convert ammonia to hydrogen with out using catalysts and with
        good efficiency.  I can not find the article now but sounded
        like a game changer - if true.

        Geoff Pullinger

        -------------- next part --------------
        An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
        URL:
        
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20140625/84d1afe0/attachment.htm>


        _______________________________________________
        UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
        http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
        For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA
        (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



I seem to remember that ammonia is very toxic - which is why I thought that this scheme had some flaw in it.

--
Geoff Pullinger

http://www.evalbum.com/2445

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20140625/e9c66fbb/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to