On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Pete Boyd <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 05/04/2016 17:54, Kaply Consulting wrote: > > It's because there are different certificates right now for sideloaded > > and not sideloaded extensions. > > > > To avoid the warning, when you submit to AMO check the "this add-on will > > be sideloaded" box. > > > > This distinction will be going away in Firefox 46. > > How does this help those of us who are unpacking and copying other > peoples' extensions to Mozilla Firefox\browser\extensions\? I have > Adblock Plus, Zotero and Zotero LibreOffice Integration all blocked. > It should allow those extensions to work in those locations now. The certificate that they are signed with by default was not a "sideload" certificate. So it didn't allow them to be placed in those locations. This change should allow that. > Having said that, Firefox's own ChatZilla and Places Maintenance are > also blocked, so does that make mine a different issue? > > xpinstall.signatures.required=false makes the issue go away for all the > above add-ons. > Nope, it would be the same issue. This is one of the reasons the certificate distinction was problematic and is going away. Mike > > Thanks > > > > -- > Pete Boyd > > Open Plan IT - http://openplanit.co.uk > The Golden Ear - http://thegoldenear.org > _______________________________________________ > Enterprise mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to > [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe" >
_______________________________________________ Enterprise mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe"
