On Sep 1, 2020, at 10:23 AM, John Mattsson <john.matts...@ericsson.com> wrote: > > If the ability to send a descriptive TLS Fatal Alert back to the peer is a > requirement, changing to close_notify seems like a bad idea.
It's fine for EAP Success. But having two different code paths is a little surprising. > My understanding is that is would add an extra roundtrip without any clear > benefits compared to sending an encrypted 0x00 application data. That's a reason to stick with sending 0x00, then. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
