On Sep 22, 2020, at 10:35 AM, John Mattsson <john.matts...@ericsson.com> wrote: > > If we are going back to an encrypted application message with 0x00, how do we > update the draft to make it clear that the commitment message is encrypted? > Several people understood that 0x00 was supposed to not be encrypted. Is > something incorrect in draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-10, or it there just a need > to add a note like: > > "Note that in TLS 1.3, all application data including the Commitment Message > is protected through authenticated encryption."?
That seems fine to me. Section 2.5 already states that 0x00 is the plaintext, and that plaintext length != encrypted length. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
