> On Nov 10, 2018, at 5:52 AM, Dr. Pala <direc...@openca.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am in favor of addressing the issue of PFS in 3GPP authentication - it is
> important work that moves cellular network authentication towards more modern
> approaches and more compatible with IETF technologies.
>
> This said, I am concerned about the fact that the IPR is not marked as
> Royalty-Free, therefore I am not in favor of adopting it if the IPR
> restrictions (fees) are not removed (please let me know if I am
> mis-interpreting the IPR declaration). I think I missed this point (maybe the
> jet lag, but it might not have been clear to the room).
>
> As a possible way forward (if IPR restrictions are not modified), we could
> work on something different that is not encumbered by patents restrictions.
> However, for this, we would need to see the specific claims of the
> application...
I share these concerns.
Alan DeKok.
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
