Hi all,I am in favor of addressing the issue of PFS in 3GPP authentication - it is important work that moves cellular network authentication towards more modern approaches and more compatible with IETF technologies.
This said, I am concerned about the fact that the IPR is not marked as Royalty-Free, therefore I am not in favor of adopting it if the IPR restrictions (fees) are not removed (please let me know if I am mis-interpreting the IPR declaration). I think I missed this point (maybe the jet lag, but it might not have been clear to the room).
As a possible way forward (if IPR restrictions are not modified), we could work on something different that is not encumbered by patents restrictions. However, for this, we would need to see the specific claims of the application...
Cheers, Max On 11/7/18 10:23 PM, Joseph Salowey wrote:
Please note there are IPR disclosure for draft-arkko-eap-aka-pfs-03.txt <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arkko-eap-aka-pfs-03.txt> available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-arkko-eap-aka-pfs.Thanks, JoeOn Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 10:13 AM Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net <mailto:j...@salowey.net>> wrote:At the IETF 103 meeting there was support in the room to adopt draft-arkko-eap-aka-pfs-03.txt as a working group item as the basis to add perfect forward secrecy to EAP-AKA. This message is to confirm that consensus. If you do not support adoption of draft-arkko-eap-aka-pfs-03.txt as WG item please say so by 2359UTC on 30 November 2018 (and say why). The draft is available at https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arkko-eap-aka-pfs-03.txt. Thanks, Joe _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
-- Best Regards, Massimiliano Pala, Ph.D. OpenCA Labs Director OpenCA Logo
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
