Still trying to digest this in between working...

On 1/10/2016 7:48 AM, Bertho Stultiens wrote:
> On 01/10/2016 12:44 PM, John Thornton wrote:
>> Well none of the suggestions about star grounding did any good. In
>> fact they made the problem worse than before, so bad I could not even
>> get 2.6 to run.
> That may suggest a couple of things being wrong simultaneously:
> 1) you may still have loops in the 0VDC which are crossing power
> domains. These /are/ hard to detect with many devices connected together;
> 2) there are impedance mismatches in the signal wiring (this one often
> works together with 1);
> 3) shields may pick up noise they should reject.
>
> The question is how to reduce the practical problems, not how to
> eliminate all theoretical problems. That is the hard part.
>
>
>> Off this list I was sent the AB servo best wiring practices pdf
>> which explained how to reduce noise in a servo drive enclosure. I
>> followed the advise as much as possible and after removing all my ground
>> wire antennas I was back running with an occasional sserial error. The
>> short explanation is to terminate the shields to a ground plane as close
>> as possible to the point where you take the shield/drain wire from the
>> cable. I still have a cable bundle running to my switch box that is
>> parallel wires and I might replace that with some twisted pairs. Photos
>> at 11.
> You refer to this document?
> http://literature.rockwellautomation.com/idc/groups/literature/documents/at/motion-at004_-en-p.pdf
>
> That doc explains very well how to separate into different power zones.
> Also, it makes a good case of shielding and how to do it properly. BTW,
> note that it uses protective ground as shield potential and _not_ 0VDC.
> That is also why the argument of two-sided termination of the shield is
> appropriate (see page 21).
>
> But all this does not save you from impedance problems. The sserial
> errors are interesting because it is probably something you actually can
> measure with an oscilloscope.
>
> You should be able to see the signal integrity and whether you have
> reflections of the signal at either end of the cable.
>
> The sserial connection has a great potential for a loop. See attached
> image for illustration. The image has a shielded connection between two
> devices, which is good. However, the 0VDC connection (aka GND), which is
> embedded in the shielded connection is shorted outside the cable via a
> protective ground connection through the PSUs. This means that part of
> the signal return may circumvent the constraints of the signal cable and
> that creates an unbalanced path. Effectively, it means that the shield
> is now part of the cable's impedance, and that is guaranteed to be off
> by a factor.
>
> You can check for this scenario by disconnecting the sserial connector
> at one side and measure 0VDC vs protective ground on the connector on
> the other side (and the other way around). You are in trouble when
> measurements on both sides indicate a connection between 0VDC and
> protective ground.
>
> If you only have one PSU for both devices, then you are potentially also
> in trouble. The PSU will then act as the loop facilitator (through two
> distinct 0VDC connections). However, the effects are more subtle and
> depend on coupling effects.
>
> The rule for a shielded cable is that all energy must be contained
> within the cable to be effective. In other words, the sum of all
> currents in the cable's wires must be zero. Bypassing some of it may
> cause impedance and therefore signal integrity problems.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to