On 10/07/2011 08:48 PM, Bruce Klawiter wrote: > > >> That sounds as good as it is going to get. Bruce > stated that the original machine could>hold .0005" tolerances on parts. I find this hard to believe with an > encoder resolution of>.0004". Maybe a good machinist could get it to make consistent > parts with some>dimension held to>+/- .0005", but it is not > believable that arbitrary parts could be made>with accuracy nearly>equal to the resolution. > Sorry what I meant was .0005" between multiple parts The machine did > not dither or do the jerking with the old Anilam control.Someone said the axis might be drifting then snap back into position, I put an indicator on an axis and it holds position and when it jerks it moves about .002" out of position then back, hard to tell it so fast. > > The servo motor is connected to the ball screw with a timing belt > and when it jerks it sounds like the belt was snapped like a rubber band, you can also feel and see it in the belt. > > see: http://sites.google.com/site/bmklawt/ > For all the information on my machine
Probably not the root cause of the problem, but you might try commenting out all the backlash statements in your ini file. Karl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
