Thanks, Brent.

 

When I was employed, the work came first, and was expected regardless of time 
for preparation for a conference.  I had to fit in my preparation  (and 
research for the conference) while maintaining the work.  And, I had to make 
sure my work was covered while I was away at the conference.  

 

There may be different priorities for the self-employed.  

 

At ISPCE, I have been a formal paper reviewer.  Three reviewers for each formal 
paper.  I remember a review where I said the paper did not address a subject 
pertinent to ISPCE; I said the paper should be rejected.  Whether or not it 
would be rejected depended on the other reviewers.  I don’t know the results.  
In another review, I found an out-and-out error, which in my opinion, was a 
cause for rejection..  Again, I don’t know whether it was rejected.  On the 
other hand, the reviewer gets to nominate the paper for the “Best Paper” award.

 

In my opinion, all formal papers should be reviewed by a peer.  ISPCE uses 
three peer reviewers.  Each reviewer gets to decide whether he is qualified to 
review the subject matter of the paper.   

 

Best wishes for the holiday season,

Rich 

 

 

From: Brent DeWitt <[email protected]> 
Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2024 7:14 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] experiments as a source of knowledge

 

Well said Richard. It's not clear why the submittal of a paper to a journal 
requires $10k investment. Many of the EMC journal papers come from university 
student groups, often led by a mentor. I doubt they invested that much money.

Respectfully,
Brent DeWitt, AB1LF
IEEE EMC Society Senior Life Member



On 12/8/2024 7:15 PM, Richard Nute wrote:

Hi Doug:  

 

I’ve been doing PowerPoint presentations and formal papers for the IEEE Product 
Safety Engineering Society since it was founded.  My employers allowed me to 
prepare on company time and paid my travel and attendance expenses.  The 
IEEE/PSES presentation/paper process has not charged me or my former employer 
for the presentations/papers.  I did get a “best paper” award in 2013.  For 
this society, there is no IEEE membership pre-requisite for presentation/paper, 
although there is a 20% higher attendance fee.   

 

Almost daily, it seems, I get invitations to present papers at some other IEEE 
conference and related conferences.  None have expenses other than the charges 
for attending the conference, which are modest.   As these are out of my field, 
I ignore them.  

 

In the past, I did some original research (published) while employed.  Now that 
I’m retired, my “research” is searching and reading published papers related to 
a particular subject.  I still do presentations and papers.  

 

I disagree with your assertion “the IEEE process makes it excessively expensive 
for an independent contributor to write a paper compared to DesignCon.”  
Attendance fees for DesignCon 2025 and IEEE PSES ISPCE 2025 are nearly equal.  

 

Richard Nute

IEEE Life Fellow

Bend, Oregon, USA

 

 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
[email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Website:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: [email protected]
Rick Linford at: [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to