IEC 61000-2-5 was compiled from historical sources, so is reliable. Regarding point a., there was an assumption that broadcast receivers would be uncommon in the industrial environment. Note also that, because of European language differences, 'industrial' in the context of 'Classes A and B' means, in British English, 'heavy industrial', and 'commercial' is the same as 'domestic' or 'residential'. Before these classes were introduced, the original IEC 61000-2-5 identified five major environments, not just two, and two is really a simplification step (by the European experts) too far. In the intervening years, a 'power station' environment has appeared, and more recently there has ben a move to separate 'professional' and 'commercial' environments from 'residential'.

On 2024-11-09 16:19, James Pawson (U3C) wrote:

Hello all,

I’m writing some guidance on Class A vs Class B and I was thinking about the Why. As in why do we separate emissions into Class A and B?

Reasons I’ve heard (which make some kind of sense even if I’ve not actually looked into the figures) include:

 1. Concentration of electronic equipment – domestic premises are more
    likely to have other interference equipment operating in closer
    proximity to receivers than in a commercial/industrial environment.

 2. Quantity of devices sold – consumer devices used in a domestic
    sphere have a much higher sales volume

 3. Nature of installation – Class A equipment installed by more
    technically competent users, Class B installed by less
    knowledgeable users.

Does anyone have any additional justification, historical perspective, or can point me in the direction of a standard that describes this in more detail?

I’ve looked in IEC TR 61000-2-5 which, although it mostly focuses on immunity, mentions these above reasons. CISPR 16-4-4 seems to deal with statistical methods. IEC TR 61000-1-1 deals in general terms with the concept of a margin between Emissions and Immunity. But no definitions for the derivation of these Classes…

Thanks in advance!

All the best

James

James Pawson

Managing Director & EMC Problem Solver

*Unit 3 Compliance Ltd*

*EMC : Environmental & Vibration : Electrical Safety : CE & UKCA : Consultancy*

www.unit3compliance.co.uk <http://www.unit3compliance.co.uk/> | ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk <mailto:ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk>

+44(0)1274 911747  |  +44(0)7811 139957

2 Wellington Business Park, New Lane, Bradford, BD4 8AL

Registered in England and Wales # 10574298

/Office hours:/

/Every morning my full attention is on consultancy, testing, and troubleshooting activities for our customers’ projects. I’m contactable between 1300h to 1730h from Monday to Friday./

/For inquiries, bookings, and testing updates please send us an email on he...@unit3compliance.co.uk <mailto:he...@unit3compliance.co.uk> or call 01274 911747. Our lead times for testing and consultancy are typically 4-5 weeks./


<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Virus-free.www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>

<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/

Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html>
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher at: j.bac...@ieee.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

--
OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best Wishes
John Woodgate
Keep trying


--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/

Website:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to