Don’t have the standard but excerpted the following off a site describing the standard. Pertinent portion underlined.
IEC 61000-2-4:2024 Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 2-4: Environment - Compatibility levels in power distribution systems in industrial locations for low-frequency conducted disturbances Standard Details IEC 61000-2-4:2024 is available as IEC 61000-2-4:2024 RLV which contains the International Standard and its Redline version, showing all changes of the technical content compared to the previous edition. IEC 61000-2-4:2024 is related to conducted disturbances in the frequency range from 0 kHz to 150 kHz. It gives compatibility levels in differential mode (L-L and L-N) for industrial locations, with a nominal voltage up to 35 kV and a nominal frequency of 50 Hz or 60 Hz. NOTE 1 Industrial locations are defined in 3.1.8. Power distribution systems on ships, aircraft, offshore platforms and railways are not included. -- Ken Javor Ph: (256) 650-5261 From: Ralph McDiarmid <[email protected]> Reply-To: <[email protected]> Date: Friday, September 6, 2024 at 1:15 PM To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PSES] : IEC 61000-2-4 scope My turn to ask a question to the group of experts. Reference: IEC 61000-2-4:2024 Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 2-4: Environment - Compatibility levels in power distribution systems in industrial locations for low-frequency conducted disturbances My client would like to know if standard IEC 61000-2-4 is applicable to an inverter that is intended for permanent installation in a motor vehicle. The inverter has no connection to a.c. mains and does not have an a.c. input power port. It’s merely a 24Vdc to 230Vac/50Hz inverter. I think this IEC standard is clearly out of scope for this class of equipment, but if client’s customer insists (a big automotive manufacturer) I’d like to be able craft a technical justification to waive application of the standard. The standard appears only to address conducted disturbances which may be present on non-public (industrial) a.c. power networks and the EMC immunity of equipment connected to those networks. Thank you, Ralph This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/ Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Mike Sherman at: [email protected] Rick Linford at: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher at: [email protected] To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1 - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/ Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Mike Sherman at: [email protected] Rick Linford at: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> _________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
