Thanks Charlie. That makes sense.
Carl
------ Original Message ------
From "Charlie Blackham" <[email protected]>
To "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Date 2/6/2023 1:26:51 PM
Subject RE: [PSES] Appropriate reference for EN standard within CB
Report
Carl
The OJ summary lists amendments separately, as published, it does not
list “standard plus amendment(s)” as you typically write on a DoC
The relevant legislation for this change EN 61010-1 is Commission
Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1779
<https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2020.399.01.0006.01.ENG&toc=OJ%3AL%3A2020%3A399%3ATOC>
of 27 November 2020
EN 61010-1:2010 ceased to provide a presumption of conformity on 30th
May 2022
In order to maintain presumption of conformity, A1:2019 must also be
applied (along with AC:2019, but that doesn’t need to be listed on the
DoC)
Best regards
Charlie
Charlie Blackham
Sulis Consultants Ltd
Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317
Web: https://sulisconsultants.com/
Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247
From:[email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: 06 February 2023 14:18
To:[email protected]
Subject: [PSES] Appropriate reference for EN standard within CB Report
Hello All,
I've included a snip here and I don't recall whether the list server
will allow that so I'll also include the text.
I checked on the revision status of EN 61010-1 within the OJ and I'm
confused because the current reference includes the withdrawn revision.
EN 61010-1:2010 was withdrawn as of 30/11/2020 but it's also included
within the current reference as follows:
EN 61010-1:2010,
EN 61010-
1:2010/A1:2019/AC:2019-04,
EN 61010-1:2010/A1:2019
Is this due to the long-standing CENELEC confusion?
Does this mean that all of these references belong on a manufacturers
DoC? Or any one of them? (e.g. EN 61010-1:2010/A1:2019/AC:2019-04)
Does this mean that the original EN 61010-1:2010 is still allowed
without the addition of A1:2019?
I'm reviewing a draft CB report and I want to get the "EN" reference
within the report to line-up with this requirement if possible.
Thanks,
Carl
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html>
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
<https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1>
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
