Charlie Blackham wrote:
The issue is that the legal bit stating that only the MD applies and not
the LVD is in the MD (below) and not included in the list of exemptions
in Annex II of the LVD
1.5. RISKS DUE TO OTHER HAZARDS
1.5.1. */Electricity supply/*
Where machinery has an electricity supply, it must be designed,
constructed and equipped in such a way that
all hazards of an electrical nature are or can be prevented.
The safety objectives set out in Directive 73/23/EEC shall apply to
machinery. However, the obligations
concerning conformity assessment and the placing on the market and/or
putting into service of machinery
with regard to electrical hazards are governed solely by this Directive.
these obligations are fulfilled (by applying the harmonized standards),
and only mentioning an additional, effectively "non-applicable"
directive shouldn't change this in my opinion.
My view is that Turkish customs are incorrect, but there’s little point
in trying to argue with them,
thanks for the confirmation, this is exactly my view of the situation.
Thanks also to the other posters.
Oliver
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
