Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes: > I like "sec:", but the only package that actually relies on this, on the > top of my head, is autoref. I prefer {sec:whatever} over > sec-whatever.
OK. Let's keep it this way then. Thanks. Regards,
Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes: > I like "sec:", but the only package that actually relies on this, on the > top of my head, is autoref. I prefer {sec:whatever} over > sec-whatever.
OK. Let's keep it this way then. Thanks. Regards,