Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > Thanks. Nitpick however: wouldn't it be more readable to use "sec-" as > a prefix instead of "sec:" in order to solve the issue?
I like "sec:", but the only package that actually relies on this, on the
top of my head, is autoref. I prefer {sec:whatever} over sec-whatever.
Rasmus
--
Dobbelt-A
