Hi Nicolas,
Thanks for all time you've put into the comments. I appreciate it,
and I will try to revise the patches over the weekend.
Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>> Using this file:
>>
>> * h1
>> :PROPERTIES:
>> :CUSTOM_ID: h1
>> :END:
>> ** h2
>> :PROPERTIES:
>> :unnumbered: t
>> :CUSTOM_ID: h2
>> :END:
>> *** h3
>> *** h4
>> * h5
>> :PROPERTIES:
>> :CUSTOM_ID: h5
>> :END:
>> [[*h1]] [[#h2]] [[*h4]] [[#h5]]
>> ** h6
>>
>> The output is now
>>
>> \section{h1}
>> \label{sec-1}
>> \subsection*{h2}
>> \label{unnumbered-1}
>> \subsubsection*{h3}
>> \label{unnumbered-2}
>> \subsubsection*{h4}
>> \label{unnumbered-3}
>> \section{h5}
>> \label{sec-2}
>> \ref{sec-1} \hyperref[unnumbered-1]{h2}
>> \hyperref[unnumbered-3]{h4} \ref{sec-2}
>> \subsection{h6}
>> \label{sec-2-1}
>>
>> Which I think is quite good.
>
> I agree.
I worry about this approach based on some observations Alan sent
off-list. When you export the quoted document with num:nil all labels
will be of the form "unnumbered-N", loosing all structure in labels.
Also, some labels are still unassigned in html for unnumbered
headlines, e.g. the "text-" (which is a function of parents' section
numbers) and outline-container-sec-.
Do you think it's better to solve the remaining issues, and accept
that when num:nil exported documents will be quite altered compared to
previously, or should I try to introduce a more informative ID for
numbered an unnumbered headlines alike?
If following the latter path, the most obvious approach (to me) would
be to have a separate :headline-id
and :headline-numbering. :headline-id could be collected using
something like `org-export--collect-headline-numbering', but labels
would not necessarily reflect the printed section numbers,
though :headline-numbering would still be "correct".
What do you think?
—Rasmus
--
. . . It begins of course with The Internet. A Net of Peers
