Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes:
> Thanks for the comments. Let's give it another try, shand't we.
There we go.
> Okay, I returned to my first hack (which never made it to this list).
> Basically, I ID everything. Unnumbered sections get the id
> "unnumbered-sec-COUNTER" and numbered sections get the id
> "sec-COUNTER".
>
> Perhaps you will find it too much of a hack.
I don't think it is a hack. I am just pointing out that how we refer
internally to headlines has an effect on output clarity. I let you
strike a balance between clarity and easiness of implementation. Note
that the internal reference can be a bit cryptic (e.g. num-1-1 and
nonum-2).
>> At the moment, referring to an unnumbered section displays its name.
>
> In some modes, yes. In LaTeX it produces a \ref{ยท} that LaTeX will
> laugh at.
This is incorrect.
#+options: num:nil
* Headline
:PROPERTIES:
:CUSTOM_ID: test
:END:
This is a link to [[#test]].
will produce
\section*{Headline}
\label{sec-1}
This is a link to \hyperref[sec-1]{Headline}.
> If you have a better idea than using the title I'm all ears!
On the contrary, using the title is what is usually done. I'm all for
it.
>> Comparing symbols with `equal' is a sin beyond redemption. Use `eq'.
>
> Why, out of curiosity? I though equal was like the meaner, tougher
> eq, that gets shit right, but is a bit more expensive.
This is about using the right tool for the job. Unless you mess with the
obarray, two symbols with the same name are guaranteed to be `eq'.
There's really no reason to use anything else.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
