Alan Schmitt <alan.schm...@polytechnique.org> writes: Hello Thorsten,
> I gave this a try, and here are some observations. > > On 2014-08-31 16:12, Thorsten Jolitz <tjol...@gmail.com> writes: > >> on your src-blocks before conversion, as an alternative, like this >> >> ,---- >> | (org-dp-toggle-headers &optional 'header) >> `---- >> >> to avoid losing the src-block header-args during conversion. > > I don't use headers in that file so I skipped that step. > >> 2. Call 'outorg-convert-org-to-outshine' just once, its only for the >> initial conversion. Then you have an outshine file that you convert to >> org occasionally with the usual 'outorg-edit-as-org'. > > As it's not interactive, I had to evaluate it. The only thing I then saw > is the reply "nil". I searched for a created buffer and I found it, but Yes, since this is most likely a seldom used function (every file is converted just once) I did not bother to make it interactive. And IIRC it returns nil and doesn't change window-config because it was written with batch calls in mind. > the results are surprising. With this small input file: > > * test > ** test2 > #+begin_src emacs-lisp > (+ 2 2) > #+end_src > > I got this output > > ;; * test > > ;; #+header: > ;; #+header: ** test2 > ;; #+begin_src emacs-lisp > ;; (+ 2 2) > ;; #+end_src Thats a bug, it should be fixed now in branch tj-outorg (which should actually be faster and better than master anyway and will hopefully be merged in a few weeks or so). Here is my org-mode test buffer: #+BEGIN_ORG * test ** test2 #+begin_src emacs-lisp (+ 2 2) #+end_src #+begin_src picolisp :exports code (+ 2 2) #+end_src #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results value :cache no (+ 2 2) #+end_src #+END_ORG and here the emacs-lisp-mode output buffer: #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp ;; * test ;; ** test2 (+ 2 2) ;; #+begin_src picolisp :exports code ;; (+ 2 2) ;; #+end_src ;; #+header: :cache no ;; #+header: :results value (+ 2 2) #+END_SRC which looks ok so far. can you test it too? PS What about switches? AFAIK they don't work yet as #+header args, is that correct? If so, is it planned to make them work as #+header args in the future? -- cheers, Thorsten
