Federico Beffa <be...@ieee.org> writes: >> But then, you introduce a discrepancy between M-q results and Org >> syntax. This is not optimal either. > > Would you mind elaborating on the discrepancy.
Ignoring \[...\] when filling the paragraph is misleading. You may believe the object doesn't belong to the paragraph at all. I think M-q should, on the contrary, give clues about the structure of the document. Also, it doesn't make a difference when exporting to LaTeX, but it might in back-ends with a different definition for paragraphs (e.g. HTML). > I do not quite understand what do you mean. Doesn't the Org syntax > "just" defines the result of parsing a buffer (like in most > programming languages where indentation and line breaks are just to > help people reading code)? Indentation and line breaks are meaningful in Org. They are not just syntactic sugar. > Yes, I agree. But, given that we do not want to make \[...\] an > `org-mode' environment for backward compatibility reasons, this > appears to be the only alternative. There is another alternative: use \begin{equation*} or \begin{displaymath}. M-q does not fill those. You're trying to solve an already solved problem, although the actual solution doesn't suit you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou 0x80A93738