Jarmo Hurri <jarmo.hu...@syk.fi> writes:
>>> While taking my first long tour in the land of Babel, I bumped into a
>>> minor hline issue. Can someone tell me why the hline has disappeared
>>> from the second table?
>>
>> Because you use CALL without arguments and argument :hlines defaults
>> to 'no'?
>
> Ok, but why is there then a hline in the raw output in table-three?
> Furthermore, setting hlines to yes makes no difference:
* test
#+NAME: table-one
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
(list '(a) '(b) 'hline '(c))
#+END_SRC
#+results: table-one
| a |
| b |
|---|
| c |
#+NAME: table-two
#+CALL: table-one[:hlines yes]()
#+results: table-two
| a |
| b |
| c |
but
#+begin_src emacs-lisp :var table=table-one :hlines yes
table
#+end_src
#+results:
| a |
| b |
|---|
| c |
seems to be a problem with #+CALL then ...
--
cheers,
Thorsten
