Hello, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" <sva-n...@mygooglest.com> writes: > >> I'd then propose the attached patch for the documentation. > > Thank you for the patch. > >> BTW, what's the difference between #+LATEX_HEADER and #+LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA >> lines, if both end up under the same umbrella ([EXTRA])? Couldn't we >> suppress >> the #+LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA keyword? > > According to section 12.7.2 in manual, LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA will not be > loaded when previewing LaTeX snippets, unlike to LATEX_HEADER.
Shouldn't the similar principle be applied to BEAMER_HEADER, that is have a BEAMER_HEADER_EXTRA keyword as well? >> * ox-latex.el (org-latex-classes): Add BEAMER_HEADER in the >> documentation string. > > `beamer' is a different back-end than `latex', or to put it differently, > `latex' back-end is not supposed to know about `beamer'. I understand. > That's why no reference to `beamer' appears in `org-latex-classes'. Though, this is only true as long as ox-beamer is not loaded. Because ox-beamer does add "beamer" to `org-latex-classes' (which is right IMO). > If documentation is needed, I think it should go in the manual, as > a footnote close to the reference to BEAMER_HEADER. OK. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
