Hello, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" <sva-n...@mygooglest.com> writes: > >> In the `org-latex-classes' documentation (and in the Org Beamer >> documentation), >> I don't see how to include or exclude lines passed through the >> #+BEAMER_HEADER >> keyword. >> >> Is there a solution for those lines? > > These lines are included in [EXTRA] placeholder, like LATEX_HEADER.
True. Confirmed ;-) I'd then propose the attached patch for the documentation. BTW, what's the difference between #+LATEX_HEADER and #+LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA lines, if both end up under the same umbrella ([EXTRA])? Couldn't we suppress the #+LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA keyword? Best regards, Seb >From 6b6e9c06e1933820a0f0a1837dc1ea3e8a090c55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastien Vauban <sva-n...@mygooglest.com> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:27:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add #+BEAMER_HEADER keyword line in [EXTRA] * ox-latex.el (org-latex-classes): Add BEAMER_HEADER in the documentation string. --- lisp/ox-latex.el | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/ox-latex.el b/lisp/ox-latex.el index ae78260..cf53c38 100644 --- a/lisp/ox-latex.el +++ b/lisp/ox-latex.el @@ -241,8 +241,8 @@ macro-like placeholders. [NO-DEFAULT-PACKAGES] do not include any of the default packages [PACKAGES] \\usepackage statements for packages [NO-PACKAGES] do not include the packages - [EXTRA] the stuff from #+LATEX_HEADER(_EXTRA) - [NO-EXTRA] do not include #+LATEX_HEADER(_EXTRA) stuff + [EXTRA] the stuff from #+LATEX/BEAMER_HEADER(_EXTRA) + [NO-EXTRA] do not include #+LATEX/BEAMER_HEADER(_EXTRA) stuff So a header like -- 1.7.9 -- Sebastien Vauban
