On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 03:00:40PM +0200, Torsten Wagner wrote:
>
> However, I believe that for many users, the special cases are not very
> frequent and complex. Might it be possible to create a very simple syntax
> for exporting rules which could be either in those above modules or
> directly within the file written by the user themself?
>
> #+HTML_USER_RULE \ruby{$1}{$2}, <ruby> $1 <rp>(</rp><rt>$2</rt><rp>)</rp>
> <\ruby>
Isn't this very similar to a #+MACRO definition but with a different
syntax and only for the HTML backend?
Maybe we could allow backend specific macro expansion definitions.
Something like:
#+HTML_MACRO: ruby <ruby> $1 <rp>(</rp><rt>$2</rt><rp>)</rp> <\ruby>
#+LATEX_MACRO: ruby \ruby{$1}{$2}
Then {{{ruby(東,ひがし)}}} will be expanded appropriately for
different backends.
What do you think?
Cheers,
PS: Actually on second thought it is probably possible to handle this
with filters although I failed to find the appropriate filter.
So you could try:
#+MACRO: ruby <cookie><$1><$2></cookie>
And the filter can translate the cookie to the appropriate backend
specific expansion.
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
