Andreas Röhler <andreas.roeh...@easy-emacs.de> writes: > Am 29.03.2013 17:20, schrieb Eric Schulte: > >> A valid opinion, in fact I think I defended that point of view myself, > > Hi Eric, > > so, if I'm saying: let's make things considerably easier, working right from > the spot, > why not try that? > > What I need still is a specification, what :session and the other header > arguments shall do. > Presently they do quite different things. Also can't read a bulk of mails to > figure out some guessing. > > Please write a specification and with the help of the other guys let's have > some tiny and > effective ob-python. >
Sorry, I'm not going to do this work for you. If you want to take a shot at re-working ob-python, then you're welcome to. However, I would recommend first reading through some of the history which lead to its current state, and fully understanding what that current state is (which at a minimum means reading and digesting the relevant documentation). > Let's see of we need more lines than ob-emacs-lisp.el :) > You will. :) Best of luck, > > Cheers -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
