> No, not at all. That's what reverting db7ece9fa2 does. And if you > really want to flip off folks with strange Org installations instead of > helping them survive, then leave out that third "t", i.e. just change > that line to:
Please lower your tone. I'm not "flipping off" anybody. > In other words something like this: > > (require 'org-compat) > (require 'org-macs) > (add-to-list 'load-path "/home/org-mode/lisp") > (require 'org) Anybody can see this is wrong, and instead of letting users shoot themselves in the foot with a wrong setup, we should educate them to use a correct one like (add-to-list 'load-path "/home/org-mode/lisp") (require 'org) which shouldn't be that hard. > will result in a correctly loaded Org with the patch, but yield either a > not-correctly working Org (silently wrong and producing strange results > that nobody can reproduce) or a failure to load Org at all (you get an > error at least) without it. I'm fine with not fixing this right now. > It is also an experiment to determine if Emacs should do something like > this (by default or as an option) and how to best implement it. Even if > it eventually moved into Emacs however, Org would still have to > implement it as a workaround for older Emacsen that don't have it. Again, I'm fine with any experiment that can be done on Emacs side so that Emacs autoloads are always correct. But I won't allow a patch that advise `require' in Org for now. Thanks, -- Bastien
