42 147 <aeus...@gmail.com> writes: > (1) is possible, but not (2) and (3), (3) being what I want (though > (2) > would be nice).
I was going to say you could use drawers instead of inline tasks (see section 2.8 of the manual), but they don't nest properly: if you put one inside the other and fold the outer one, it only folds to the next :END:. So if you've got this: #+DRAWERS: SOMEDRAWER ANOTHER * Header :SOMEDRAWER: Some stuff. :ANOTHER: More stuff here. :END: Some more stuff. :END: TAB on the top drawername gives you this: :SOMEDRAWER:... Some more stuff. :END: Rather than this: :SOMEDRAWER:... :END: Regular org uses `org-flag-drawer' for this, which just searches for the next :END: string. I thought org elements might handle it differently, but `org-element-drawer-parser' just does the same thing: searches for the next :END: string. If drawers are "greater elements" in org elements, perhaps they ought to be able to contain other drawers? Or is non-nesting drawers a design decision? E
