I do have gfortran
Mahler:org-mode neuwirth$ whereis gfortran
/usr/bin/gfortran
Version information
Mahler:org-mode neuwirth$ gfortran
i686-apple-darwin11-gfortran-4.2.1: no input files
And it is in emacs' exec-path
exec-path
("/usr/bin" "/bin" "/usr/sbin" "/sbin"
"/Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/MacOS/bin")
I already installed Mountain Lion
Emacs version
(emacs-version)
"GNU Emacs 24.1.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin, NS apple-appkit-1038.36)
of 2012-06-10 on bob.porkrind.org"
I did not run the tests from within Emacs, I ran
make test
in the directory where I keep the sources
I am using git to pull the current version
Are the tests supposed to work only from within Emacs?
On Aug 1, 2012, at 4:23 PM, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Hi Erich,
>
> yes, it does make sense to report such errors as they may be related to
> your architecture/installation -- and developers cannot test all possible
> architectures/installations.
>
> Neuwirth Erich <erich.neuwi...@univie.ac.at> writes:
>
>> I am regularly building org mode on my Mac.
>> I do not pretend to bean experienced Emacs programmer, but I am will it to
>> help if I can contribute.
>>
>> This is what I get when I run
>> make test
>> on the current source.
>>
>> Ran 314 tests, 307 results as expected, 7 unexpected (2012-08-01
>> 16:06:02+0200)
>> 5 expected failures
>
> I can't reproduce this on my Emacs.
>
> GNU Emacs 24.1.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.10)
> of 2012-07-26 on myhost
>
>> 7 unexpected results:
>> FAILED ob-fortran/command-arguments
>> FAILED ob-fortran/fortran-var-program
>> FAILED ob-fortran/input-var
>> FAILED ob-fortran/list-var
>> FAILED ob-fortran/list-var-from-table
>> FAILED ob-fortran/preprosessor-var
>> FAILED ob-fortran/simple-program
>
> Hopefully someone using a Mac can try against latest git head and run a
> make test to confirm.
>
>> Does it make any sense for the developers that I mail this?
>> Should I send more or is this useless information?
>
> You should test what is your version of MacOSX and Emacs.
>
> M-x emacs-version RET
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Bastien
